EARTH SHATTERING – retelling the ‘Creation’ Story as Never Before!

I am going to agree here (for the sake of argument) that God actually dictated EVERY word in the original Scriptures. I am even willing to agree (if you don’t mind) that God physically held the hands of those who COPIED the original manuscripts so they could do it without missing even a single punctuation… (See, I am willing to agree what most of you wouldn’t)!

a95998dd-fd96-4bed-9fd4-9314362dd9ac.jpg

(Pic courtesy: duonglinh.cdnvn)

But … (now, this is one big BUT!), since most Hebrew words have more than one meaning attached to it, how could those who translated from the copy-scripts decide which one of those words would have been the author’s original choice??? For example: the Hebrew word “Ruach” (translated as “Spirit”) can mean wind, breath, exhalation, life, anger, spirit: – air, blast, courage, mind, side, spiritual, tempest, vain, whirlwind…! With such variety of words at my disposal I could interpret Gen 1:2 – And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters, as: And the ‘anger’ of God moved over the face of the waters!! Or Gen 6:3 – And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man as: And the Lord said, My ‘air’ shall not always strive with man…!!

Some words like “alah” in Hebrew, found in Gen 2:6 and is translated as “went up”, can even have opposite meanings: ascend, climb up or fall! HENCE NO ONE – EXCEPT GOD HIMSELF AND THE ORIGINAL WRITERS – CAN AUTHORITATIVELY ESTABLISH THE TRANSLATOR’S CHOICE OF A WORD AS RIGHT OR WRONG!!!!! “What about the ‘context’?”, you may ask. Well, isnt the context also made up of the choice of more such words, isnt it?!!

Another example (not just to rub it in, but also to get you into a nice ‘groove’ before giving you the jolt!): Gen 2:1– Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. 2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. With the variety of meanings each Hebrew word provides, I am going to translate this verse differently: Thus the “lofty” “nations” were “destroyed”, and all their “army”. And the seventh “time” God made “clean riddance” of his “cattle” which he “had become”; and he “celebrated” on the seventh “day” “over” all his work which he had “bruised”…!!!! 😀 Why Not?!

 

Got it…?! So Lets Get Down to Business

On the basis of what I have shown above and the backing of what I have learnt over the past few years, I am going to translate the Creation Story mentioned in Genesis in a way that it brings out what I feel is more likely what had happened. This has nothing to do with Judaist teachings. Infact, even the Jews will be “jolted” to see this! What you are going to read below is radical in the light of both Jewish and Christian teachings. Some of it is probably brought out for the first time within this group!! How then do I insist on this being a truer interpretation? Because, as you will realise when you read through, it straightens out almost all of the grey areas – those previously unanswerable questions! Let me remind you, I have only chosen words and meanings available in the lexicons. So, here we go….!

Lets start with Gen 1:1It is translated into English as: In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. But in Hebrew it is: rê’shı̂yth – bârâ’ – ‘ĕlôhı̂ym – ‘êth – shâmayim – ‘êth – ‘erets.  And with the available Hebrew meanings for each word, this is how I translate it:

Gen 1:1-The gods first chose their heavenly places and their nations.

I’ve given below a break-up of the Hebrew words and its available meanings for this verse so that you know how I arrived at this translation:

rê’shı̂ythfirst, in place, time, order or rank (specifically a firstfruit): – beginning, chief (-est), first (-fruits, part, time), principal thing.

bârâ’ – (absolutely) to create; (qualified) to cut down (a wood), select, feed (as formative processes): – choose, create (creator), cut down, dispatch, do, make (fat).

 ‘ĕlôhı̂ymgods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: – angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty.

‘êth – in the demonstrative sense of entity; properly self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely): – (As such unrepresented in English.)

shâmayim – from an unused root meaning to be lofty; the sky (as aloft; the dual perhaps alluding to the visible arch in which the clouds move, as well as to the higher ether where the celestial bodies revolve): – air, X astrologer, heaven (-s).

‘êth – in the demonstrative sense of entity; properly self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely) : – (As such unrepresented in English).

‘erets – From an unused root probably meaning to be firm; the earth (at large, or partitively a land): –  X common, country, earth, field, ground, land, X nations, way, + wilderness, world.

The word “Elohiym”, according to the lexicon normally means “gods” – not “God”! Up until Gen 2:4, the word Elohiym is used without any accompanying title or article. As you can see above, Elohiym can also mean judge, angel, mighty men or gods. When used alone, it can NEVER refer to the Almighty God. For example: Exo 18:11 – Now I know that the LORD (yehôvâh) is greater than all other gods (‘ĕlôhı̂ym).  Exo 12:12 – “and I will bring judgment on all the gods (‘ĕlôhı̂ym) of Egypt. I am the LORD (yehôvâh)”. Jos 22:22– The LORD (yehôvâh) God (‘êl) of gods (‘ĕlôhı̂ym).

If, as is commonly taught, the plurality of the word Elohiym refers to the Trinity of the Godhead, then Ex 18:11 should mean: Yehovah is greater than the Triune God! HENCE THE CLAIM THAT THE WORD “ELOHIYM”, BY ITS PLURALITY, REFERS TO THE “TRIUNE” GOD, IS SIMPLY ABSURD, TOTALLY NONSENSICAL AND AGAINST THE BASIC SENSE OF THE WORD! But, like in the verse below, when a specific title is used along with it, its meaning changes: Gen 2:4 – in the day that the LORD (yehôvâh) God (‘ĕlôhı̂ym) made the earth and the heavens…And this usage changes the creation story, too! (Keep reading).

But, isn’t it unscriptural to consider that “gods”, and not “Yehovah” as being instrumental in the creation event in Gen 1? Firstly, you need to understand who the Scriptures refer to as “gods”.  Just to help you in your thinking: HOW CAN GOD (YEHOVAH) BE A “GOD OF GODS” IF THERE REALLY ARE NO OTHER “GODS”??!! Its like claiming to be a “father” of many children without really having any children; Or a Director of a company which does not have any employees…!! God is not that cheap that He has to claim false titles for Himself. SO WHO ARE THESE “ELOHIYM” (GODS) WHOSE “EL” (GOD) IS “YEHOVAH” (ETERNAL ONE)? (I am writing about this in another write up, but for now read: “Deciphering G-O-D”, below).

Secondly, as you would have noted in my translation above, GEN 1:1 DOES NOT TALK ABOUT ANY CREATION ACTIVITY!!! It only talks about a selection process. Gods selected their lands! In this light, the Hindu belief that different planets are ruled by different gods does not seem farfetched. (Now, only if you keep reading you will understand it fully)!

Let me repeat:

Gen 1:1-The gods first chose their heavenly places and their nations.

2 -The land existed as desolate, devoid and dark for a long time because of a catastrophe. And the spirit gods shook over its face their semen.

(Oh, I know…! Just go to the lexicons and search out these words for yourselves. No spoon-feeding). Just as there are similarities between the Sanskrit and Hebrew languages, there are a lot of similarities between Jewish religious thoughts and Hinduism (things even Jewish teachers are not fully aware of!). According to some Hindu teachings, living beings were created when gods shook their semen onto the earth. The Hebrew word “mayim” used there for “water”, though commonly used to refer to drinking water, by euphemism can also mean – urine, semen: –  + piss, wasting.

Since there is no reason to conclude that Gen 1 mentions about the first creation of the earth we now live in, we can safely conclude that gods (elohyim), after first choosing their spaces, started their creation process in the places they selected for themselves. That way it is not hard to understand why intellectuals belonging to Hinduism can believe that Parashuram created Kerala by throwing his spade (Now, only if you keep reading you will understand it fully)!

3– And gods commanded light to come forth and light came forth.

This does not refer to any universal light, but is very clearly the light that came out of the darkness that covered the “land” (solar system?) at that time.

4 – The gods, they perceived that the light was truly precious: and so gods made a separation between the light and the darkness.

5 – The gods pronounced light as life and darkness as a misfortune. Came dusk and came dawn – the first time.

Please note: the Hebrew word “Yom”, translated as “day”, is mentioned only now (in vr 5), not before! In Hebrew, vr 5 ends as: hayah ereb hayah boqer yom echad. Since “Yom” also means a “process of time” or a period, the verse can be translated as: came dusk came dawn time first! The NIV is more accurate with its translation:“And there was evening, and there was morning–the first day”. Unlike the KJV, which translates it as:  “And the evening and the morning were the first day”. The use of “were” is not there in the Hebrew text and is used there by KJV to give it a different meaning.

We should also note here that the words “ereb” and “boqer” specifically means “dusk” and “dawn” and not “day” and “night”. The verse below makes it clear: Gen 8:22 – While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day (yôm) and night (layil  lêyl) shall not cease. So KJV has got its basics wrong here. I always used to wonder why “dusk” is mentioned as the start of a day in Genesis and not the “dawn”… now I know – its all just a big misinterpretation based on how Yom is translated!

In vr 5 the “dusk” follows the emergence of light and its separation from darkness, and then “dawn” follows dusk, after which a new time or day is born, in which a new work is done! In other words, AFTER an act of creation, there was dusk which was followed by dawn and then a new day and a new creation!!! So that gives us the freedom to conclude that the day starts at dawn, when the first rays of sun starts driving the night away – and that makes more sense! NOW, THE JEWS WILL BE SHATTERED TO KNOW THAT THE PHRASE USED THERE DOES NOT IN ANY WAY REFER TO THE START OF A NEW DAY AT DUSK!! The Jews and the Muslims count the start of the day at dusk, and Christians, most absurdly, count it from the middle of the night. But, interestingly, Hinduism counts the start of a day from the dawn!

From vr 1-4, we see the gods choosing their own spaces and then creating the light before starting off with their creational activities. From the way vr 5 ends (and with a good mix of some common sense) we can understand that THE FIRST DAY COMES ONLY AFTER THE CREATION OF THE LIGHT, BECAUSE HOW CAN THERE BE A “DAY” WITHOUT “LIGHT”?! Hence, the first day starts only in vr 5, AFTER the creation of light!

 

THIS CALLS FOR A RE-ARRANGEMENT OF THE CREATION TIMETABLE (!!!!):

– 1st Day (vr 5) – making of the firmament (vrs 6-8).

– 2nd Day (vr 8) – dry land and plants (vrs 9-12).

– 3rd Day (vr 13) – great and small lights in heaven for signs and seasons (vrs 14-18).

– 4th Day (vr 19) – fish and fowl emerge from water (vrs 20-22)*. Very Scientific!

– 5th Day (vr 23) – cattle and creatures emerge from the earth (24,25). Hinduism-like.

– 6th Day (vr  ?) – man was designed (vrs 26-30).

– 7th Day (vr  ?) – The day each creation was designated its role.

*This is how vrs 20-23 should have been translated: The gods commanded: let the waters bring out moving creatures that has life. And the waters brought forth fish and fowl in abundance. Those who know science would know how much more likelier it is for this to have happened this way than any other!

Except for after the creation of the firmament on the first day and the creation of ‘man’ on the 6th day (the first and the last creations mentioned in Ge 1), the word “good” is used to describe every creation. And each time, after the mention of “good”, we see the start of a new day and a new creation. Hence, it is surprising, that inspite of the use of the word “good” after the creation of cattle and creatures on the 5th day (vr 25), there is no mention of the start of another new day!

Gen 1:31 ends by saying: came dusk came dawn sixth day. Yet, we see Gen 2:2 starting with the mention of the activities of the 7th day. AND, UNLESS WE ACCEPT THAT THE FIRST “DAY” COULD EXIST EVEN BEFORE THE CREATION OF “LIGHT”, WE CANNOT FALL BACK TO THE OLD CREATION ORDER BASED ON WHICH WE ASSUME THAT GEN 1:31 TALKS ABOUT THE END OF 6TH DAY.

The solution: had the “hayah ereb hayah boqer” of vr 31 been mentioned at the end of vr 25 (keeping up with the order till then), and the one in vr 31 ended with “hayah ereb hayah boqer – yom shebiyiy (day seven)”, then the whole ‘schedule’ would have fallen right in place – with a lot more sense! Unless someone insists that God physically held the hands of every manuscript copiers and controlled their every thought while they were on it, I am willing to give some leeway for human error – deliberate or otherwise – to have crept in right from the first copy-writing to the final translation! As long as it is not a case of direct divine dictation at every stage – original writing, copy writing, and translation, there is bound to be mistakes. Haven’t you played “Chinese Whisper”?!

26 – And gods said, let us make a ruddy image that resembles us, to rule over the fish of the sea, the birds of the air, beasts of the whole earth and every reptile that moves on the earth.

Reference        Word used     Heb               Mean                                                                                – Gen 1:26      – “man”          – adam          – ruddy.

– Lam 4:7        – “ruddy”       – adam          – reddish.

– Songs 5:10   – “ruddy”       – adom           – rosy.

– 1Sam 17:42  – “ruddy”      – admoniy     – reddish.

WE HAVE TO NOTE A VERY IMPORTANT POINT HERE: IT IS NOT CLAIMED ANYWHERE IN THE CREATION STORY OF GEN 1 THAT THE CREATION OF “MAN” MENTIONED IN VR 26 IS THE FIRST EVER CREATION OF A MAN – OR THE LAST!!

27 – So gods designed a ruddy image in their resemblance. The image gods designed in their resemblance, were divided into male and female selves.

According to some ancient beliefs, gods consist of both the sexes. Those who know biology knows that it is possible for both the sexes to be present in one body. Hence a person who is a bisexual is considered to have a god-like, dual spirited soul (not necessarily “body”). Here we see that when gods created human beings, they separated the sexes and gave them a different body.

28 – And gods blessed the images and said: O gods! Take up authority on thyself and completely subdue the nations. Rule over the fish of the sea, the birds of the air and every living being that moves on the earth.

The ruddy beings were given ‘complete’ authority to rule over “the nations” and “every living being that moves”, which would include the non-ruddy human beings – the black race (who probably survived the previous “catastrophe”, after which this new creation process started).  No wonder excavations keep throwing up human bones that are ages old! And life in Africa is said to have been the oldest!  This explains Cain’s fear of being attacked and the special protection he got from God!  It also explains what Cain meant when he said to Yehovah that he will be hidden from His face.

This also explains why Yehovah was upset with the SONS of gods (Elohyim) mingling with the daughters of ‘men’ (Adam, whom He created).The “Sons of God” in Gen 6 and Job 1 are literally sons of gods – the human representation of Elohiym – the ruddy beings. Compare with Job 38:7. According to Gen 6:4, giants were already there and children born to sons of gods and daughters of men were also mighty men from eternity past (or, from the previous life)…!!

Gen 2:-

1– Thus the heaven and the earth were completed with all its people.

2 – And the seventh day the gods finished deputing all that they had made.

3 – And gods congratulated each other on the seventh day and dedicated it for celebration because of all the work they had planned and executed.

Here we see that the gods are done with their creations and they celebrate their achievement by giving themselves a “weekly off” and a ‘party’!

 

The 2nd Creation Story!

Ge 2:4 – This is the detail of the heavens and the earth as they were created when Yehovah Elohim created them.

This verse draws a line between the creation acts of the gods (Elohim) in Gen 1 and that of Yehovah God. It doesn’t mean that what the gods created was destroyed by Yehovah.  The gods created the ‘ruddy’ men – the whites, but Yehovah moulded man from the clay of the ground – the brownish men. Compare it with Gen 6:6,7- Yehovah repented that He made men on the earth and He (Yehovah) vowed to destroy the men He had made (vr7) – not the whole world!

FROM GEN 2:4, YEHOVAH ELOHIYM COMES INTO THE PICTURE AND A DIFFERENT CREATION STORY BEGINS. Here is the table of comparison of both the creations:

Genesis 1                                                                               Genesis 2 (vr4 on)

1) Creation by Elohyim                                                    – Creation by Yehovah Elohyim

2) Elohyim designed male and female images           – Yehovah moulded a male out of the                                                                                                   ground

3) Human images designed after the creation of      – Man moulded before the creation of plants (vr5)*                                                                         of plants

4) Animals created before man                                       – Animals created out of the ground                                                                                                     after the creation of man.

5) Elohyim designed men in their likeness and                 – Yehovah moulds man out of the   they were living beings (Ge 1:27)                                      ground and gives him life by                                                                                                                breathing into him (Ge 2:7).

*In Ge 2:5, we see an empty, dry earth – with no rain and no man to work on it – when Yehovah created Adam! (– There came up fog over the earth and moistened the whole soil). But in Ge 1, we see an earth already teeming with life when Elohyim made their images!

 

Deciphering G-O-D

Verses where different names of “GOD” first appear:

Ge 1:1 – In the beginning Elohim created; 26 – Then Elohim said, “Let us make man…”

Ge 2:4 – When the Yehovah Elohim made the earth and the heavens

Ge 12:1 – The Lord Yehovah had said to Abram

Ge 15:1 – After this the word of Yehovah came to Abram in a vision….

Vr 2 – But Abram said, Adonay Yehovih

Vr 7 – He also said to him, I am the Yehovah who brought you out of Ur

Ge 17:1 – When Abram was ninety-nine years old, the Lord appeared to him and said, I am EL Shaddai

Almost none of the major world religions have given a first name for the Only Almighty God. “Om” in Hinduism just means “an all-encompassing one” who is both the creator and the destroyer. The word “Shaddai” in Hebrew also means “the nurturer and the destroyer”. Even the name “Yehovah”, is not a Noun! It is an amalgamation of the first letters of a sentence (read more below).

Many world religions have this concept of gods having appeared in different forms (avatars), but none of these gods are considered THE ultimate, all-powerful God. But many times such avatars are referred to as God almighty more because of whom they represent.

In that sense, the saying that God is one and everyone calls on Him with different names, makes some sense. Because everyone who believes in a God believes that there is ONE Almighty God who is above all other gods (including Hindus who worship the ONE Almighty God through His different avatars! Thus, Hinduism is NOT a polytheist religion!!!).

IF WE BELIEVE THAT THERE IS ONLY ONE ALMIGHTY GOD THEN HOW CAN WE BE WORRIED ABOUT SOMEONE ELSE BELIEVING IN ANOTHER ALMIGHTY GOD?! AND IF THAT OTHER PERSON ALSO BELIEVES THAT THERE IS ONLY ONE ALMIGHTY GOD THEN HOW CAN BOTH BE TALKING ABOUT DIFFERENT GODS??!!

 

EL of EL-ohim

We have to keep in mind that EL (God) is a title and Shaddai (Almighty) is the adjective given to the title – THEY ARE NOT NAMES! Likewise, YHWH (Yehovah), though used commonly as a noun (introduced so by Moses) is in reality, a Tetragrammaton.  As I had revealed in one of my previous write-ups, “I am that I am” (of Ex 3:14) is NOT revealed there as God’s name! God was revealing His state of being. As a verb it means “to be” or “to exist”, and so the sentence can mean “I am my own cause” or “I self-exist”. Thus the word YHWH actually means “the eternally self-existent One”. So, we have an Almighty (Shaddai) God (EL), who is Eternally Existent (YHWH – YeHoVaH ).

Then there is Elohim (gods).EL means God and EL-ohim means gods. So there’s no way both EL and Elohim means the same – one is singular and the other plural. EL cannot be Elohim also because Yehovah is said to be the EL (God) of Elohim (gods): Jos 22:22 – אלאלהיםיהוה – Yehovah, EL of Elohim (Self-existent, God of gods). As I said, just like how I cannot claim to be a king of a kingdom without having a kingdom in the first place, God cannot claim to be the God of gods if there are no gods, in the first place. So, who does this Elohim (gods) refer to?

 

Wicked EL-ohim

Let me introduce to you the bad ones first. There are naughty, disobedient, and even wicked gods (Elohim). Righteous men who lead an exemplary life are elevated to be righteous or holy Elohim. As inheritors of god-like image, they are given the responsibility to spread godly knowledge to likely candidates (like with Enoch). Similarly, wicked men through their wicked influences are elevated to being revered as gods by men. And they go about causing trouble in God’s creations, leading them to rebellion and destruction. The first of whom is said to be Nimrod – grandson of Noah.

Deu 32:17 – They sacrificed unto devils, not to God (Eloha); to gods (Elohim) whom they knew not, to new gods (Elohim) that came newly up, whom your fathers feared not.

God here is talking about evil men (devils) who are elevated to be wicked Elohim, and are worshipped by men. The later part of the verse also means that the patriarchs of Israel feared other Elohim…!! Now, eat that! (The verses below will help you in digesting it…!!!):

 

EL-ohim of Fathers

Ge 5:24 – Enoch moved along with gods (Elohim) – and he was unsearchable because Elohyim took (lâqach) him away. Enoch had a constant relation with gods and he got his wisdom from them. He was so liked by Elohyim that they carried him away without letting him pass through the process of physical death. For us, lesser mortals, we too can hope for a carrying away – after death, as sons of Korah wrote: Psa 49:15 – But God will redeem my soul from the power of the grave: for he shall receive (lâqach) me.

I believe that Enoch was elevated to being an Elohim. So can human beings become gods? Psa 82:6– I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High. 7 But ye shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes. Also Isa 41:23…!!!

You will also be pleased to know this: Gen 32:28 – And he said, Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel: for as a prince hast thou power with God (Elohim) and with men, and hast prevailed. 30 – And Jacob called the name of the place Peniel: for I have seen God (Elohim) face to face, and my life is preserved. Here, Jacob is not fighting with the Almighty Yehovah but with an Elohyim! But, if you insist that Elohyim by its plurality refers to the Triune God and that Jacob was not fighting any ‘god’, then it should mean that Jacob was fighting God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit, all at the same time and all three together could not defeat a cowardly, hairless man, inspite of fighting with him the whole night!!!!! (You wont get me to believe that nonsense. I can assure you that!!).

 

Mythically Yours

Abraham Jos

Advertisements

Why They Reject the NT and Its Messiah

Just when I thought that I had gathered the answers for almost all of my queries about Bible and Christianity, there came a couple of “Brethren” friends who set my ‘tail’ on fire! One asked me if I thought that Mary’s ovum was used for Jesus the embryo. The other “Brethren” asked me how the ‘virginity’ of Mary could ever be a sign to anyone else on earth?!! These jolted me out of my sense of contentment and pushed me into another ‘search and rescue mission’. I wondered why the Jews who waited for thousands of years for their Messiah to come, chose as a nation to reject Jesus? I wanted to know what un-converted Jews had to say about it. So I ended up personally interacting with five (un-‘christened’) Jewish Rabbis and spending 15-20 hours each day for 3 years in a row studying, researching, questioning and writing what i came across. The outcome was so profound that it changed my total outlook.

What we (Protestants) think that they (Jews) think is not exactly what they think (and vice versa in some cases). We think that they consider Jesus only as a prophet and not as a Messiah. But most of them do not even consider Jesus as a real person. Some say that maybe there was someone by that name who, like many other rebel leaders, tried to upstage the Romans and was killed. We say, silly Jews, they are missing out on God’s eternal salvation by rejecting Jesus the Messiah. But they say, silly Protestants, since man is not born in sin, we don’t need a Saviour for our Salvation!

The Jews don’t believe that man is born in sin; but that he chooses to sin by his own free will and that forgiveness from sin can still be attained in the Old ‘Testamental’ way so they don’t need a ‘New’ Testamental saviour to die for them. The whole concept that when Adam sinned, his sinless, immortal constitution changed into a sinful, mortal one plunging the whole human race into sin, is just an assumption. Why so? Because there is no record of such a change in Genesis. We just read it INTO the passage. Infact, if we read Ge 3 carefully we can see that nothing had changed in them after the sin because they stopped living for ever only because God sent them away from the tree of life!! And why exactly did God have to send them away from the tree of life? Because God knew that since nothing had changed they could continue living for ever if they had access to the tree of life – just like before they sinned!

One of the proofs of “birth sin” that is often mentioned  is how the kids lie and steal right from their early childhood days. People ask, who taught that kid to lie at that age? But my question is, who taught that kid to feel guilty at that age? If they were born in sin they shouldn’t be feeling guilty about it!! Since the feeling of guilt is a result of the sense of righteousness within, the way kids try and hide their wrongs reveals to us that that sense of righteousness is implanted in them!! If the human race had by default become sinful because of Adam’s sin, and they were all born as sinners thereafter, then wasn’t God over-reacting in Ge 6:5,6? If sinners weren’t sinful, what else was God expecting them to be??! If we insist that Adam and Eve became sinners and lost God’s glory because of the sin they committed, then we have a very serious problem in our hands. In Ge 3:22 while referring to Adam’s state after his sin we see God saying “Behold, the man is become AS ONE OF US”…! O, God! Ho, ho, ho, ho!! Did you hear what God said? Because of his sin Adam became more like God (“is become as one”) than what he was while he was sinless..!!!! Can someone give me a bottle of logic please…? I’m thirsty! I don’t think Elohyim had any idea about Adam’s “sinful nature” when he made that statement! But I won’t criticise Him squarely for that. Poor guy, He didn’t have any Bible Colleges to go to, did He?

So, what about the fellowship with God that we say was broken after sin? Interestingly, while there is no record of any details of God fellowshipping with them before the sin, we can see God very personally fellowshipping with them after the sin! He comes searching for them (like as before), has conversation with them, He makes designer leather jackets for them, etc.! He is later seen chatting up with the murderer Cain and even puts a divine security seal on him threatening to punish anyone who would dare harm him..!! Hence, the opposite is true concerning the effect of sin on God’ s fellowship with man. He continues to keep in cordial touch with Adam, Cain and others after sin!

In the Messianic verses of the OT God talks about raising his anointed servant in the last days (the “last days” – yom – common sense suggests, could definitely not have been 2000yrs ago! It’s yet to come). Who, when he appears, will uphold the Law of God and help the children of Israel in their complete restoration and eternal sanctification (IN ONE COMING) – something which the Christians have failed to see happen with Jesus. But on the other hand, God also says that this anointed one will bring God-fearing, Law-abiding Gentiles unto himself and gather them into his ever-lasting home – something that the Jews have difficulty accepting. While, on the one hand, the Jews are entrapped by their over-whelming focus on traditions and a misplaced fear of God that has resulted in a lack of proper Godly insight (not knowledge) of the Scriptures. On the other, the Christians are caged-in by the Hellenised version of the Scripture and their blind surrender to the “New” Pauline teachings!

Many NT teachers know that they are precariously perched atop a swaying tree but they just can’t cut the branch on which they are holding on to (can they?!). No wonder they have to resort to embarrassing logics to defend their position (that includes even the best of apologetic teachers in Christendom)! With a desire to end this embarrassment, I venture to chop out some rotten roots of Christianity that are feeding on misconceptions and misinterpretations. Inspite of the threat of further isolation that hangs over me, I hereby proceed, deriving strength from the fact that God is equally upset with the high-jacking of His perpetual precepts and the appalling apologetics that try and justify the same!

The Axe is Fallen on Christian Roots!!!!

1) Lord’s Day SundayJesus Rose-Again Day

The NT does not mention anywhere that Sunday is the Lord’s Day. Writer John of the book of Revelation mentions Lord’s Day, without specifying it as a Sunday (or even a Saturday). But using the laws of Protestant interpretation, since Sunday is not mentioned as the Lord’s Day anywhere else in the Bible, then this should by default be referring to the Sabbath because in the NT the Lord Jesus says that he is the “Lord of the Sabbath” – which would thus qualify the seventh day to be the Lord’s Day. Infact, it seems that the Greek phrase used there refers to the great “Day of the LORD,” – the “Yom Adonai” – which is a future event. So what is the big deal, you ask? The big deal is that, if it cannot be established that the term “Lord’s Day” used by John in Revelation is a Sunday, then that leaves the Sunday Believers with ABSOLUTELY NO verse in the entire Bible to support such an important basis of their faith – the Sunday worship!! (Acts 20 is being dealt below).

It is said that Sunday came to be considered as the Lord’s Day because Jesus rose again on it. But who asked whom to consider it so? The Bible does not record the disciples arriving at such conclusions. So form where did the concept creep in? (Acts 20 is being dealt below). What if I were to say that we should consider Friday as the Lord’s Day because it was on that day that the Lord gave himself up for the mankind…? Who would be competent to decide which one to follow??

The really shattering part here is that the gospels does not say anywhere that Jesus rose up on a Sunday morning..!! (Yes, you should verify it yourselves). Oh yes, I have read the part where Mary went early in the morning on the First Day of the Week (FDoW) to the tomb and found it empty. If you pay attention, you would realise to your utter amazement that the verse does not say that Jesus rose again on that day. It only says that he was not there when Mary reached there early Sunday morning. “What’s the big deal?” you ask. The big deal is that, based on that verse you can ONLY ASSUME (not claim) that Jesus rose again on a Sunday…!!!! What about Jesus’ claim that he will rise again after three days? Wont it be then on Sunday…?? I have dealt with it in another of my write ups… (Its like how you try and evade one pothole only to bump into a bigger one)!! So, “Lord’s Day – Sunday – Jesus rose-again day” is just an assumption, at best…!!

Have you ever wondered how dumb the disciples had to be to not understand that Jesus would die only to rise up again after three days?! He warned them many times, very specifically that he would die but rise again the third day. If I were to tell my kids the same things (inspite of the fact that I have not done any miracles before; or that they are too young to grasp the meaning), they would anxiously await the third day. How come NO ONE, including the guards and the disciples, saw the actual resurrection – which according to the NT teachers is the main teaching on which the NT church stands??! According to the OT law: Deut 19:15 – “at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall a matter be establishment”. Poor God! Now how can he criticise the Jews for not believing in the resurrection story – there were no witnesses of the incident??!!

2) The Breaking of Bread Ritual

It is said that the NT ritual of Breaking Bread as ordained by Jesus was first observed daily by his apostles and then due to practical constraints shifted to only once a week. Acts 20 is said to be the passage which proves that the early church kept the ritual weekly on Sundays. But let me ask you something: Since Sunday was not a weekly holiday those days (it was a normal working day all over the world), what practical reasons would have made them to choose that day over the rest of the working days??!!! (Now, don’t go back to the “Lord’s Day” point again, please)! If you have noticed, Jesus did not (ritually) Break Bread with his disciples the first Sunday after resurrection!

So what about the term Breaking of Bread (BoB) mentioned in Acts 20…? Again, it’s a misinterpretation. Because the term BoB is just a term used to refer to eating food, according to both the Scriptural and cultural context – NOTHING ELSE. Scriptural Context: in Luke 24:35, when the disciples of Emmaus tell the other disciples “how (Jesus) was known of them in breaking of bread”, they were referring to the dinner Jesus had with them before he disappeared. (More examples of such non-ritual “breaking bread”: Mat 14:19 / Mat 15:36 / Luke 24:30 / Acts 27:35).  So (once again, based on the laws of Protestant interpretations), unless otherwise specified, the term BoB should only mean having food. Even according to the Cultural Context, all through the ages, the Middle Eastern people have their meals by literally breaking their bread. So world over, the term Breaking Bread is used commonly to refer to having a meal. The 30th March 2012 edition of the Bangalore Times paper carries a front page write up about Indian actress Vidya Balan. It says: “Vidya isn’t breaking bread with the big daddies (top film-makers), post work”. I hope you did not for a moment think that Vidya Balan and the other film-makers are actually NT believers..!!

3) God-inspired Holy Bible

The word “inspire” basically means, to encourage. So it should just mean that God encouraged the writers to write what he wanted them to. That would then mean that the writers could use their own words. This would eventually mean that every word of the original was not from God. Then there is a problem. They say that every word of the original text was from God….! When a class teacher dictates notes to her students, every word would be hers and every note will look identical. The individuality, outlook or other differences of the students won’t be seen in their notes (except for the handwriting, that is). But, when the class teacher inspires her students to write, say a poem or a short story, inspite of the topic given being the same, every note will be different . So, when you say “God-inspired”, you are actually wanting to mean “God-dictated”. In that case, how can anyone explain the numerous NT misquotes from the OT, which is ascribed to the writer’s desire to pacify certain section of its readers? Why is it claimed that Matthew and Luke probably borrowed from Mark when the HS (who is the same as God the Father, but different) was standing by to help dictate every word..??

Just an example: From the four gospel writers, three quotes Jesus as saying that Peter would deny him thrice before the cock crows. But Mark specifically mentions “before the cock crow TWICE”. The four gospel writers are quoting/un-quoting the words of Jesus with the dictation of the Holy Spirit and yet manages to have four different quotes altogether..!!  When such discrepancies are brought to the notice of the ‘apologetic’ teachers, you are given the example of how four journalists reporting the same incident may have slight differences in their reports. It would have been understandable if it were a case of four journalists seeing things in four different ways, and because of their human limitations getting certain DETAILS differently. But, 1) we are talking here about four writers (from which two have probably witnessed that incident) being dictated every word by the SAME all-knowing God the Spirit…!!!! How can they manage to see things differently (remember the class teacher’s example given above)…….??!! 2) The worst part is, NO JOURNALIST, NO MATTER HOW DIFFERENT THEY ARE, CAN GET A QUOTE/UNQUOTE DIFFERENTLY!!!! What a cock-n-bull story!!!  I have a better explanation for all this, I feel that when God fore-saw the four gospels written identically, he would have realised how boring it would  be for us. So he told the HS to allow some interesting variations to creep in… just to keep us excited!!

Infact, Luke 1:1-3, shatters the Holy Spirit dictationship myth..! In vr 1 he claims that many have written the gospel. Please note that he does not discredit them. Infact, he goes on to add that what the “many” had written were “most surely believed” by the apostles (read the verse carefully). In vr 2 he says that the “eyewitnesses”, who also ministered the word, passed on these “many” writings. In vr 3, he says he was also encouraged to write, “in order”, “all things” that he had “perfectly understood” “from the very beginning” …!!!!! I get a feeling that when Luke started writing, the Holy Spirit would have gone on vacation. Seriously! He had already worked with “many” people to write the gospel and here is a gentile who was not an eyewitness nor a disciple of one, venturing to write the same story all over again…!! “Give me a break”, the HS would have said!!!  Luke here is destroying the all-Scripture-God-inspired myth, when he says that he is venturing to write a) what he has heard from the eyewitnesses, b) read from their accounts, and c) which he has set in order according to his “perfect” understanding (leaving no room for any outside help)!!!! I am really ashamed at the stupid defences that people like Josh McDowell, Ravi Zac, etc., bring out in support of such discrepancies! No wonder why learned men seldom accept the gospel that is preached..!!! It sounds so childishly silly.

Neither God in the OT nor Jesus in the NT mentions about any additions to the Scriptures. When you read the Bible you can see that the NT writers wrote the gospels and the letters to individuals or specific groups for their consumption and it was read by those who received them – as normal letters were read.  The only claim of the NT as ‘scripture’ comes from within itself – 2Pe 3:16. Which, if carefully studied, contradicts 2Ti 3:16! Paul talks about “All” Scripture that is already given (at the time of his writing), which is good enough to make the man of God perfect (and you don’t need to add to perfectness, do you?!). What “holy Scriptures” do you think he is referring to in vr 15 that Timothy’s mother and grandmother taught him (2Ti 1:5) as a child? The proof of credibility of the NT should come not from within itself, but from what was already there. Otherwise it would mean that if someone were to write a book and claim in it that it was a part of the scripture and add it to the rest of the Bible, we then have no option but to just accept it!

The Jews never claim inerrancy of the written word (even of the Torah) and so they do not have a problem accepting that there are post-Moses additions to it. We think that our OT of the Bible and the Jewish Scriptures are the same. The fact is that the books are the same but there are differences in the usages and crucial words. A Jewish Rabbi tells me that the KJV OT is the closest translation to the Jewish Bible, but even that is influenced heavily by a Christianised Messianic outlook.

What has the NT done?

1) It contradicts God’s words: When God says in the OT “there is NO ONE else”, Jesus says in the NT “believe ALSO in me”.

2) It glorifies what God abhors: God says in the OT that human sacrifice is an abomination to him, but the NT not only glorifies it but holds God responsible for the most popular one in human history!

3) It belittles what God esteems: When God himself is proud of the Law He gave to Israel to keep them perpetually and counts them to be a privileged group for having it, the NT counts it a curse.

4) It is confuses the wit out: There are 100s of denominational splits based on the interpretations of the NT doctrines. Most of the differences are still unsolved. There are hardly any based on the OT.

5) It leads to a guilt-ridden life: It claims that man is born in sin and is prone to sin all his present life. It says that apart from the free gift of forgiveness, man on his own is incapable to please God. While, the God of OT expects man to please Him with their good intent and deed!

 4) The Great I AM

One of the many proofs of Jesus’ divinity is his use of God’s name “I am”… (another stupid logic that I felt so bad about, even as a youngster)!!! Jesus once said “before Abraham was, I am”. “I” is ego and “am” is aimi which means I exist or I have been. Jesus was trying to tell his listeners that he started existing before Abraham. He could have said “before Abraham was, I was”, but that would mean that he is no more now. So to convey that he was there before Abraham was and he still is, Jesus was only using the best available grammar. Even otherwise, Jesus only used 1/3rd of the name of God. He just used “I am” from “I am that I am”. With that logic, Paul should be more of God than Jesus because in 1Cor 15:10, he says: “I am what I am”… Here he uses the complete phrase; only one alphabet is different; and the meaning is almost the same!!! Step aside Jesus, Paul is a bigger God than you!!

What makes it more stupefying is the fact that the place where God is said to be revealing his name to Moses is grossly misunderstood. If you read carefully you will be zapped. Moses asks God what he should say when he goes to the Israelites and tells them that the “The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you” and they ask him “what is his name?” God replies to Moses saying “I am that I am” – hayah asher hayah – which means, I exist because I exist. In other words “go tell them that I am the self-existent one. I don’t need a name”…! Just a small example: say I had many children and they were all playing outside except one who was at home and as the sun was setting I tell the one at home to go tell his brothers that daddy is calling. If he was to ask me “Daddy, what if they ask me what your name is?” and I with a smile on my face tell him “just tell, daddy told”, would that mean my name is “Mr Just Tell Daddy Told”???!!! How much brains do you need to immediately say “no”?!

So, did God not reveal His name to Moses? If you read further (Ex 3:15), you can see God saying “Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, The LORD God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, hath sent me unto you THIS is my name for ever”. “This”, not “that”! This, what I said just now is my name. That, what I said then, is what I am. Moses, please don’t get confused….!!! Imagine, if someone were stop me on the road and ask me “what is your name?” and I, not able to hear properly, ask back “What did you ask?” And if that person were to say: “Oh! Glad to meet you Mr What-did-you-ask!”, how ridiculous would that be? Imagine further, if the same person were to ask the same question to my son and he not able to hear properly ask back “what?” and the man exclaims: “Oh! So you and your father are one!”, how extremely ridiculous would that be, too, right? “I AM” is not a part of God’s name… I AM sorry! Really, I AM!!

5) Yehovah and His God-heads

It is very interesting to note that OT nowhere talks about any God-heads but the one Yahweh God. It does not talk about a God-Son or a God-Spirit who are different in everything and yet one in everyway. According to the NT, Psalm 110 is a prophecy about Jesus. If you read the background you can understand that it was infact a Psalm written by David for the coronation ceremony of his son Solomon as the king and was used for similar ceremonies thereafter. In vr 1 David says: “The Lord (Yehovah – self existent) says to my lord (adon – ruler, owner)”. The word adon is the same used by Sarah to address Abraham in Ge 18:12. Where does the second person in Trinity (who is the same as the first person in the Trinity but different), fit in here?

If you say that David is referring to the second person in Trinity with the second “Lord” (adon), as his Lord, then the question that begs to be asked is was the first “Lord” (Yehovah) not David’s Lord? If both Yehovah and adon were the same then how come one is David’s Lord and the other is not? And if both the Lords were David’s Lords, because they both were one, then why does David only call one of them his “Lord”? Did he not understand Trinity? (Probably not, because it was not taught in his times)!! The basic problem with all major Christian teachings is the inability of Bible-teaching westerners to properly understand and thus interpret eastern cultures and lifestyles on which the Bible is based. They could not fathom that a king can be called “god”, or a master, “father”.

Let me draw your attention to a seemingly unharmful but very dynamic verse: Isa 44:6Thus saith the LORD (yehôvâh), the King of Israel, and his Redeemer the LORD of hosts: I am the first, and I am the last, and beside* Me there is no God (‘ĕlôhı̂ym). *(a part of; from or out of, among, because of, by reason of, through, with). Here we see yehôvâh categorically claiming that there is no ‘ĕlôhı̂ym (the part of Trinity where Jesus was supposed to fit in) before Him, after Him, because of Him, by the reason of Him, through Him or WITH HIM..!! As if He foresaw the “begotten son” claims that were to come!

A Question that begs to be Asked :-

Heb 12:2Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God.

Being seated at the right hand is a symbolic place of highest honour given by a greater authority. So when the Bible says that Christ was seated at the right hand of God then won’t it put a glorified Christ below in the hierarchy with God as he is seated at God’s right hand? What really needs to be asked is “where is the Holy Spirit seated?” Don’t tell me that he is seated on the left hand of God, because if being seated on the right hand is the highest honour one can give to another then being seated on the left hand would be a lesser honour. Thus the HS should be considered lower than Jesus in hierarchy..!! But why this disparity in equality??!!

 6) Sinless – Lion of Judah – Born of a Virgin

The “virgin birth” is supposed to be one of the greatest prophetic fulfilments of Jesus the Messiah. It was meant to be a sign to mankind. But…, apart from the fact that the verse taken from Isaiah, to claim the virgin birth prophecy, is a shining example of ridiculous misinterpretations, how could Mary’s virginity during her delivery ever be a sign to any other human being on earth?! Even her mother would have doubted her chastity, once she became pregnant..!! What a nonsense sign that turned out to be – a sign that no one could see!! A sign that backfired so badly that Mary was considered adulterous and Jesus – a bastard!! I guess it would have been wiser on God’s part to have let Jesus be born through Zacharias and Elizabeth (who were also righteous and blameless before Him), and let John be born through Mary….! Or, did Gabriel get it botched up?!

So, was Jesus born sinless because a man’s sperm was not used? (If Mary was righteous enough to bear a sinless child, and her cousin Elizabeth and her husband Zacharias be righteous and blameless enough to be considered so by God, what then was the need for crucifixion, in the first place?)!! But, if Mary’s ovum was used by the Holy Spirit to form Jesus the embryo and if this embryo-Jesus did ‘feed’ on his mother Mary through the umbilical cord, if he did suck from Mary’s breasts as a new-born baby and if any part of Mary’s DNA was passed onto this baby Jesus… then how could he be sinless? Otherwise, Mary, her parents and her whole lineage should have been born sinless…! If we consider that Mary’s ovum was not used but she only carried God’s embryo in her womb and that the child was not connected to Mary in anyway and did not even suck her breasts, then how can he ever be David’s son without any human connection to David??

Did you know that according to the Jewish custom, a child inherits a tribe only through his father? By being born to a Jewish mother one only becomes a Jew, but he belongs to a tribe only through his father!! So, if Jesus had to be from the tribe of Judah, he had to have a biological father from that tribe. (Legal fatherhood is only for human ‘consumption’). Which means, if a Jewish woman, say from the tribe of Levi, gives birth out of wedlock to a child whose father is from the tribe of Benjamin, but is legally adopted by her husband who is from the tribe of Judah, the child will be considered by others as part of the tribe of Judah, but only as long as his biological father is not known (spl during those days when ‘actuality’ superseded ‘legality’). But as far as God is concerned, since he knows from the beginning who his biological father is, the child will not be considered by Him as from the tribe of Judah…!! So Mary’s tribal root is not enough to connect Jesus to the tribe of Judah.

God very specifically claims in the OT that a descendent from the line of David will sit on the throne of David to rule the world…!!! Ps 2:12 – “Kiss the Son”. The Hebrew word used here for “son” is bar which means “heir to the throne”. (In vr 7 the Lord tells David “You are my Son”. The word used there is bane which means son of a father). So the warning given in vr 10 to kings and rulers is to “serve the Lord with fear” and to kiss the heir to the throne of the king installed on Zion (vr 6). The chapter ends by saying that blessed are those who take refuge in this heir to the throne. When God says that the anointed one will be from the tribe of Judah, then he should be born of the sperm of a human male from that tribe. Otherwise, what God said would turn out to be meaningless. Since only biological sons are legal heirs to their father’s throne and since Jesus does not have a paternal biological descent from David (in anyway), we could conclude that he is NOT the future heir to David’s throne!!

So, is Jesus not the Messiah? The word mashı̂yach (Messiah) means – an anointed person or a consecrated person: like a king (I Sam 26:11) or a priest (Lev 4:3). God through his prophets, anointed kings, priests and others from time to time for certain tasks. Jesus cannot be an anointed one because, as God, he did not need to be “set apart” for any task! We should keep in mind that  “mashach” – the process of anointing – was introduced by God as a sign to reveal His approval to man (anointer, ‘anointee’ and witnesses)!! As we see in 1Sam 16:1, God had already chosen David to be the king, but anointing was done in the presence of his family (vr13). God considered it as a formal commissioning because He filled David with His Spirit from that day on. So God the Son being anointed to reign on David’s throne will be like the owner of a company writing an appointment letter for himself – with his seal and signature!!!

A classical representation of misinterpretations is the prophecy of Messiah in Gen 3:15 – “And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel”. It is said that the woman’s seed mentioned here is in singular hence it refers to Jesus the Messiah. RUBBISH! The “seed” – zera – is always used in ‘singular’, ex: Ge 13:16. Well… (I have had lots of ‘fun’ asking this to others): IF GOD HERE IS REFERRING TO JESUS AS EVE’S SEED, THEN WHO IS THE SEED OF THE SERPENT THAT HE IS REFERRING TO? (If you are at home, please feel free to scratch your head)!! It is very clear from Ge 3: 14(thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go) that God was cursing a real snake that belonged to the animal kingdom. So, contextually, when God says “thy seed” to the snake, he should be referring to real (animal) snakes. If, for the sake of argument, we consider that God was referring to satan and Jesus, then the ‘prophecy’ was not fulfilled. Jesus underachieved it as he could not even scratch satan’s head, while satan exceeded his brief as he actually bruised Jesus from head to toe!!

Greco + Romo = Christo:

Isn’t it interesting that the Jews were greatly impacted by 150yrs of Greek occupation! Hellenistic Judaism is an offshoot of the Greek impact. The Jews were subject to various occupations and exiles (some lasting few centuries) but no exile has made such a great impact on them. The Hebrew Scripture was said to be translated into Greek to help the Jewish population that had forgotten their language. When you consider the fact that the Vedas did not have to be translated into English to help the Indians who had forgotten their mother tongue during their 400yrs of British occupation, you can understand that there is more to it “than meets the eye”! You can see that it was all a part of a ‘greater’ plan. Alexander the Great was convinced that the Greek culture was the one force that could unify the world (the motivation behind his unbelievable conquest spree). So he made sure that Greek language and philosophy were accepted by everyone – including the Jews. And if you ever thought that Greek influence died out a little after Alexander, then you are wrong, becauseit is very much alive and kicking!!!

If we look around we can see Christian countries aggressively imposing western philosophies on the world through democratic governance, modern education, religious teachings and (even) sporting activities. This led me to search forthe origin of this western philosophy. If we study about it we can understand that it is an off-shoot of Greek and Roman philosophies.Socrates, Plato and Aristotle – three great philosophers the world has ever known – were Greek. They are credited with having laid the foundations of Western philosophy and science!  According to GREEK PHILOSOPHY of the origin of universe, Chaos (a body that contains all elements of nature) produced Gaea (earth), which inturn produced Uranus (heaven) and later married each other. Through their union came Cronos (Saturn) who married his sister Rhea (?) and Zues was their child. Chaos in English means confusion or disorder (it has its origin from the Greek word khaos, which means void or nothingness). It’s no small surprise thus that Georges Lemaître, the man who proposed what is now known as “the Big Bang theory”, was a Roman Catholic priest and a professor of physics at the Catholic University of Louvain! He had his early education at a Jesuit secondary school and studied civil engineering at the Catholic University! Galileo Galilei – an Italian physicist, mathematician and astronomer; who is known as the father of modern astronomy and science and played a major role in the Scientific Revolution – was a Roman Catholic. Albert Einstein who came from a non-observant Jewish family attended a Catholic school!

FORMAL EDUCATION existed in ancient times in Greece, Rome, India and China. During the Middle Ages, the monasteries of the Catholic Churches in Europe were the centres of education and literacy. Prior to their formal establishment, many medieval universities were run for hundreds of years as Christian monastic schools (Scholae monasticae), in which monks taught classes; evidence of these dates back to the early 6th century. The current system of education, with its western style and content, was introduced and spread around by the British.

Though a wide range of SPORTING ACTIVITIES were already established in China, Egypt and Persia, even as early as 2000BC, it was the Greeks who organised and regulated it by creating the Olympic Games. The origin of these Olympics is shrouded in mystery and legend. One of the most popular myths identifies Heracles and his father Zeus as the progenitors of the Games.  The Olympics were of fundamental religious importance, featuring sporting events alongside ritual sacrifices. For the ancient Greeks, fire had divine connotations—it was thought to have been stolen from the gods by Prometheus. During the Olympic Games, which honoured Zeus, additional fires were lit at his temple and that of his wife, Hera. The modern Olympic flame is ignited at the site where the temple of Hera used to stand . Eleven women, representing the Vestal Virgins, perform a ceremony in which the torch is kindled by the light of the Sun, its rays concentrated by a parabolic mirror. The first Olympics was conducted in the honour of Zeus. Pelops, a divine hero and mythical king of Olympia is also honoured. Olympia, the site where the Olympic Games in classical times were held, dating back to 776 BC, is also a temple sanctuary of ancient Greece. Enclosed within the sacred enclosure are the Temple of Hera and Temple of Zeus, and the area of the altar, where sacrifices were made.

Believe it or not, even the concept of a DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE has its formal origins in Ancient Greece. The term Democracy first appeared in ancient Greek political and philosophical thought. The Greek city state of Athens, led by Cleisthenes, established what is generally held as the first democracy in 507 BCE. And who is pushing hard for this Greek-invented form of government? Christians! You can see the ‘connect’ now, don’t you?! If you think that this western philosophy is doing the world a world of good, then take a 2nd thought. Take a look at every country that is christian-dominated, western-educated and democratically governed – countries like UK, USA and Australia – and compare their prevalent moral and social values with that of the Muslim countries. Look at the cities of India that are influenced by the western philosophies and compare its values with that of villages and towns not influenced by them. (Please note that we have to measure the values on the basis of the scriptures given by God). This philosophy is made to turn man against God!

I am glad that God is initially sending His messiah to take control of the earth and to rule it! Because, if He were to come to this earth in a human form, He would immediately be arrested, tried and hanged by the International Court of Justice, for the atrocities He has committed against mankind in human right violations, war crimes and abuse of power!!!! Take a look at His record: He initiated brutal, inhuman capital punishment even for petty offences; he encouraged slavery; He tolerated polygamy; He ordered ethnic cleansing which resulted in the killing of thousands of innocent women and children; His commandments were pro-men and against equality of women (ex: test of virginity not for men); He propagated animal sacrifice and allowed the killing of millions of animals; He has threatened to kill everyone who does not follow his commands by some ‘weapons’ of mass destruction…!! In light of the modern, western philosophy that governs the world today, Jehovah God appears to be worse than Hitler, Saddam or even W Bush! God needs to be hanged – send Him down here, ye angels!!

When Rome took control of Greece they adopted their gods and gave them Latin names. They also created a few myths of their own including The Founding of Rome. In ROMAN RELIGION the worship of the Greek sun god Helios was converted into the cult of Sol Invictus (Invincible Sun). The worship of Sol as special protector of the emperors and of the empire remained the chief imperial religion until it was incorporated into Christianity. Some early Christian writers connected the sun to the birth of Jesus, which they believe was prophesied in Malachi 4:2 as the “Sun of Righteousness.” It is believed that the date of December 25th for Christmas was selected in order to correspond with the Roman festival of Dies Natalis Solis Invicti – the birthday of the unconquered sun. “O, how wonderfully acted Providence that on that day on which that Sun was born…Christ should be born”, wrote Saint Cyprian, Bishop of Carthage.

The fusion of Greek, Roman and Palestinian communities, under the secure Roman rule, formed the background for the new era of Christendom. The widespread adoption of Christianity helped in popularizing the Greek and Roman myths. From the early years of Renaissance, artists such as Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, and Raphael, portrayed the Pagan subjects of Greek mythology alongside more conventional Christian themes. Through the medium of Latin and the works of Ovid, Greek myth influenced medieval and Renaissance poets such as Petrarch, Boccaccio and Dante in Italy. The acceptance of Christianity enabled the Romans to take hold of the majority middle-class, thus enabling them to further their theme of universality (Catholicism).

(Images missing)

(Pic 1): The Lament for Icarus by Herbert James Draper, 1898. Compare both the above pics: note the head fallen to the right, bent legs, cloth around the groin, hand of the woman beneath the upper torso, tending females, etc. Both are ‘fallen’ sons of gods – one is Greek and the other Roman!!

The link between modern Roman Catholicism and Greek beliefs is evident in a few symbols:

(Images missing)

The symbol X with a P placed in its centre is derived from the first two Greek words for Christ (Christos), Chi – X and Rho – P. These are the letters that supposedly appeared to Emperor Constantine after which he made Christianity the official religion of Rome.

IXOYE is an abbreviation of the Greek words Iesous Christos Theou Uios Soter (Jesus Christ, God’s Son, Saviour). It’s pronounced as “ickthoos” and they are similar to the Greek word for “fish”, which went on to become a popular Christianity symbol, probably 2nd only to the cross.

Thus, the most famous Christian symbol – the Cross – has a Roman connect; while the second most famous Christian symbol – the Fish – has a Greek connect!! Interesting?!

It is disturbingly evident that Protestant Christianity, as an offshoot of the Roman Catholic Christianity, is only another extension of the clever combination of Greek mythologies, Eastern mysticism and Judaism, designed to lead mankind away from the only, true Yahweh God, and his ordinances and promises (More about it in my next article: Gentiles to Jehovah)! The similarities between the two are very overwhelming! And the differences that are there in basic teachings like salvation through faith, priesthood of all, etc., is outside the purview of Jehovah’s precepts. It’s frightening to realise that these daughter-in-laws of God are in effect worshipping:-

1) the Sun god on Sundays :

 

 

(Images missing)

Nimrod      Ra – Egyptian       Helios – Greek     Roman Sun god          Christ-ian god       

The worship of the sun god can be traced all the way back from Catholic Christianity to Nimrod via Romans, Greeks, Egyptians and Babylonians. Nimrod, who was the great grandson of Noah rebelled against Jehovah God and probably initiated the building of the Tower of Babel. After his death he was worshipped as the sun god. The rebellion that he started continued down the ages through various religious practices and philosophical teachings. In the year 46 BC, Roman Emperor Julius Caesar incorporated pagan days into his Julian Calendar. In 325 AD the Roman Empire changed the day of Christian worship to Sunday – the day Egyptian sun god was worshiped. In 1582 AD, Pope Gregory XIII made slight changes to the Julian Calendar and named it the Georgian Calendar. It then went on to become the common world calendar with the help of the British.

 

(Image missing)

The Colossus of Rhodes was a statue of the Greek Sun god HELIOS, erected in the city of Rhodes on the Greek island of Rhodes by Chares of Lindos between 292 and 280 BC. It is considered one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World.

 

(Image missing)

Statue of Liberty: The design, posture and dimensions of the Statue of Liberty in New York Harbor are based on what the Colossus was thought by engineers in the late 19th century to have looked like. There is a famous reference to the Colossus in the sonnet “The New Colossus” by Emma Lazarus, written in 1883 and inscribed on a plaque located inside the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty:

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame, With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame is the imprisoned lightning, and her name Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.

“Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

The connect between the ancient statue of Helios in Rhodes Island and the Statue of Liberty in the US is interesting. When you consider the fact that it is this Greek god Helios look-alike structure that reminds Americans of “liberty”, “equal rights”, etc., we can trail the source of these new-age thoughts that have given the world one of the most shattered societies ever – the world capital of modern immorality!

2) God Janus on January 1st ‘midnight’:

The earliest recorded New Year celebrations comes from the ancient Babylonians. The practice of New Year’s resolutions has also been traced to the ancient Babylonians. It is the Romans who began the practice of beginning the year with January 1. This happened somewhere during the 2nd BC, when Jan and Feb were included to the otherwise 10 month long calendar year that started with March.

 

(Image missing)

Janus Bifrons  (Vatican Museum)

In ancient Roman religion and mythology, Janus is the god of beginnings and transitions. He is the two-faced god who looks to the future and the past. The Romans dedicated the month of January to Janus. It is perplexing to see even Protestant Christians sit through the past and the future on the night of Dec 31/Jan 1…! Blind to the philosophy behind it?

3) and, above all, Jesus of the NT (who is an adaption of Zeus, the chief of Greek gods!):

(Images missing)

Zeus (Greek)                                         Jupiter (Roman)                  Jesus (Christian)               (Museo Pio-Clementino), Vatican.    (Roman King of gods)         (St Peter’s Basilica, Vatican)

It may be more than just a coincidence that the name “Jesus” resembles “Zeus”, the chief of the Olympian gods. What explanation can be given to the bust of Zeus being erected in a museum in Vatican?! The Roman equivalent to Zeus is god Jupiter. He was endowed with all the noblest elements in human character. He ruled the affairs of men with fatherly benevolence. He rewarded goodness, punished the wicked, and was withal the fountain-head of justice. By a nod of his head he made known his will, and there was no appeal from his decrees – a la Jehovah! During the time of the Greek rule over the Jews, between 330 BC – 166 BC, Antiochus Epiphanes dedicated the temple at Jerusalem to Zues. Thus it is possible that “Jesus” was a Greek attempt to make Jewish inroads.

 

Conclusion:

With all the facts that are available with us we can conclude that Christ and Christianity were an invention of the Greeks (Acts 11:26And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch – a Greek city – not Jerusalem).  It was later adopted by the Romans who mixed Babylonian and Egyptian paganism to it and made it popular. More recently, the British took its “side-shoots”- Protestant Christianity – out of the European “closet” and spread it through the world. The NT Christ and his teachings are profound and popular, no doubt. Turn the other cheek; walk the extra mile, do unto others what you want others to do to you, etc. are unique and great. But great philosophies cannot reciprocate God or stand between Him and His plans (and remember, other religions too have great teachings that has influenced the society. Like Buddhism). WE HAVE BEEN HANDED DOWN THE LEGACY OF NIMROD. INFACT, ALL RELIGIONS LEAD TO NIMROD – NOT ROME!

When God has set certain perpetual standards that He said He would only change after a certain time (and that time is yet to come), why would I want to believe someone who claims to have come to change it before-time? When provisions for forgiveness of sins and eternal life are already set in place by God Himself, why should I unnecessarily follow a new and different system? God says: LOOK UNTO ME, AND BE YE SAVED, ALL THE ENDS OF THE EARTH; FOR I AM GOD, AND THERE IS NONE ELSE (Isa 45:22). If you ask me, when the Owner of the Company himself has given me the appointment letter, why should I run behind his son?! Huh??

Just like how you would not wish to continue living in a house – inspite of how Beautiful or Big it is – if its Foundations are Found to be False, I find it difficult to believe or follow any teaching or practice that – inspite of how Popular or Pious it is – puts down or resists the scrutiny of its basic source or its foundational truths and tries to defend itself by its own claims.All those who do not wish to be rudely awakened by reality to Face the Fierceness of Facts should continue slumbering in their Faith Fiefdoms.

Others… wake up!

Yours Enlightened

Abraham Jos