TAKING THE MICKEY OUT OF THE SPHERICAL EARTH ‘SCIENCE’!
(YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN BLIND! But whatever you read hereafter, will be used against you in the court of conscience). 😉 😛
If you laugh out loud the moment you hear “FLAT EARTH”, then you are nothing more than a BLIND BELIEVER of Greek Mythology (also called “Modern Science”)!!! So, sober up!
Just imagine this: the same scientists who make you believe that massive amounts of water can hold itself up below a globe earth, with the help of some mysterious energy called “Gravity”, makes you wonder in disbelief how water would not fall off of a flat earth!!!! Just ask any kid what is easier to believe, THAT A FLAT DISC COULD HOLD WATER ON IT OR A ROUND BALL COULD HOLD WATER UNDER IT (that mysterious ‘ENERGY’ notwithstanding)??????!!!!!!!!!
The difference between a “true” scientist and a pretentious one is that, when a true scientist is presented with a claim contrary to his existing conclusions, he would consider it seriously and research it sincerely, because a true scientist knows that there is a whole lot out there that he really does not know! But a pretentious ‘scientist’ will immediately pounce on you, abuse you verbally and attack you personally, trying to belittle you in the hope that your message is also belittled in the process, without realizing that he is actually showcasing the same insecurities showcased by a blind follower of religion!
I need to say this here: “LACK OF PROOF FOR SOMETHING IS NOT A PROOF IN ITSELF FOR ANYTHING”! So when a ‘scientist’ tells you “Its not scientifically proved”, it does not mean “it is not true” (though that is what he expects you to conclude). It only means that it has not been researched or studied yet by those poor Scientists – for lack of ability or possibility!! So, if you dont want to continue as a blind follower of Greek-mythology rooted “modern science”, then just open your eyes and start using your brains (it wont hurt; I promise)!
EXPOSING THE ‘UNDERBELLY’ OF THE GLOBE EARTH!
(Pic: Galileo explaining Jupiter’s moons to Catholic Cardinals. Courtesy: nationalgeographic.org)
“The earliest reliably documented mention of the spherical Earth concept dates from around the 6th century BC when it appeared in ancient Greek philosophy but remained a matter of speculation until the 3rd century BC, when Hellenistic astronomy established the spherical shape of the Earth as a physical given.
Though the earliest written mention of a spherical Earth comes from ancient Greek sources, there is no account of how the sphericity of the Earth was discovered. A plausible explanation is that it was “the experience of travellers that suggested such an explanation for the variation in the observable altitude and the change in the area of circumpolar stars. A practical demonstration of Earth’s sphericity was achieved by Ferdinand Magellan and Juan Sebastián Elcano‘s expedition’s circumnavigation (1519−1522).
Early Greek philosophers alluded to a spherical Earth, though with some ambiguity. Pythagoras (6th century BC) was among those said to have originated the idea. Plato (427–347 BC) also taught his students that Earth was a sphere though he offered no justifications. “My conviction is that the Earth is a round body in the centre of the heavens, and therefore has no need of air or of any similar force to be a support”, he wrote.
Aristotle (384-322 BC) was Plato’s prize student and “the mind of the school”. Aristotle observed “there are starts seen in Egypt and [….] Cyprus, which are not seen in the northerly regions”. Since this could only happen on a curved surface, he too ‘believed’ Earth was a sphere “of no great size”. It was Eratosthenes, a Greek astronomer from Hellenistic Libya (276-194 BC), who estimated Earth’s circumference around 240 BC.
From its Greek origins, the idea of a spherical earth, along with much of Greek astronomical thought, slowly spread across the globe and ultimately became the adopted view in all major astronomical traditions. In the West, the idea came to the Romans through the lengthy process of cross-fertilization with Hellenistic civilization”. (Data source: Wikipedia)
WHAT THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO THINK:
1) The launch of the first human-made object to orbit Earth was by the Soviet Union’s Sputnik 1, on 4 October 1957, and the first claim to Moon landing was by the American Apollo 11 mission on 20 July 1969!
2) The earliest known working telescopes appeared in the Netherlands in 1608. Galileo used one of these in 1609. The Ritchey-Chretien variant of Cassegrain reflector was invented around 1910, and widely adopted only after 1950; many modern telescopes including the Hubble Space Telescope use this design. (I don’t need to mention here that you cannot see the shape of earth with a telescope on the earth)!!!
Compare these with the fact that the earliest mention of a spherical Earth dates back to the 6th century BC, and the first attempts to ‘scientifically’ prove Earth’s sphericity were made way back in 1519−1522!!!! How audaciously stupid, when the earliest known telescope appeared only in 1608 and the first claim to space travel was made only in 1957!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
How can any attempt to establish the shape of the earth, before someone or something could actually fly out of the earth’s atmosphere, far enough to turn around and see the whole earth, be asserted as a “scientific fact” when its very clearly nothing more than just an assumption??!!! How can there be any “science” behind such mythological assumptions??? What ‘holier’ ground do these ‘globe-al’ scientists claim to have to enforce their ‘blind beliefs’ on others as irrefutable “facts”??!!
DEAR BLIND FOLLOWERS OF SCIENCE:
The Heliocentric belief of the Solar System was NOT based on any ‘scientific’ evidences, in the first place, but was purported by the Greeks who worshiped the sun god HELIO and wanted to make people accept the Sun as the center of it all, with everything else just revolving around it! This belief was later embraced by the Romans, integrated into their official religion, Christianity, and taught around the world through their educational institutes!
It is very clear from the above Facts that the sphericity of the earth was not theorized based on any ‘scientific’ evidence but merely on the mythological beliefs of the Greek. It need not be highlighted here that even in 2017 AD, there are no REAL, solid evidences of a globe earth, apart from that ONE nicely Photoshoped image of a globe in perfect circle, showing an out of proportion continent of Africa and a rich blue ocean, when even an amateur photographer would have taken atleast 100 HD shots each day!! A total disaster for a theory purported way back in the 6th Century BC!!!
FOR THE KIND ATTENTION OF BIBLE BELIEVERS:
In the book of Job 38:11-14, it is written that the dayspring is caused to know its place so it can take hold of the ends of the earth and that the ends of the earth, is turned as clay to the seal! The Hebrew word “chotham” used there for “seal” means “signature seal” or “signet” used by kings or authorities.
So THAT, my dear ‘believers’, is the real shape of the Earth!
Pic 1 – A Signet Seal (Courtesy: workersforjesus.com)
In the book of Isaiah 40:22 it says, “It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth”. The Hebrew word used here for “circle” is “chûg” and means “a circle, circuit, compassive”. This is not the same word used to refer a globe or a ball. In chapter 22:18 of the same book it is written, “He will surely violently turn and toss thee like a ball”. The Hebrew word for “ball” here is “dûr” and means “a circle, ball or pile: – turn, round about”.
Pic 2 – A Flat Earth model (Courtesy: aplanetruth.info)
THE NORTH POLE IN THE BIBLE
Job 26:7 – “He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing. 10 He hath compassed the waters with bounds, until the day and night come to an end”. “Until the day and night come to an end” could also mean that ‘where the day and night comes to an end’. In other words, Day and Night, caused by the rotation of the Sun above the circle of the earth, is limited within the “bounds (walls of ice)” placed around the earth. Interestingly, the Bible DOES NOT talk about the South Pole!!!
ISNT THE SUN AND THE MOON ROUND?
Before i leave the globe-earthers flat, let me address one major ‘proof’ these blind globe-believers keep throwing at you… they say that since the Sun, Moon and the other Planets that you can see are Round, the earth should also be ROUND! Well, i fall flat at the feet of such ‘scientific’ proofs. It leaves me numb with its depth of thought! Sighhh!!!
Just take a good look at this pic. To say that the earth should also be round because the planets around it are round, is like saying that the Christmas Tree should be round because all the balls hanging around it are round!! (Even a 5 year old will cry in shame at such logic)! 😀 😀
Even otherwise, are the stars that we see in the night, round? Are the asteroids and comets that fly by the earth, round? Dont they zoom through the space inspite of their irregular shape?? More interestingly, are the Sun and Moon spherical or oval in shape?????? So whats the big deal with the shape???
Be Enlightened: The Earth IS the centre of this planetary group. The Sun and Moon are made for the earth, to revolve over it to manipulate seasons. And the Planets are made to revolve around the earth to influence its electro-magnetic fields. Hence the circular shape to enhance their motion.
FALLING OFF OF THE EDGE
Many people ask, if the earth was flat, wont we all just fall off the edge? Well, that question arises because of the misconception about how the edge is.
Recently, the mission to search for the mysteriously missing MH370 was called off citing that the area of the Ocean being searched was too vast and dangerous. With all the modern technology that we posses, this earth is still vast and unreachable!
Do you know that individuals are not allowed to go to “South Pole”? You need permission from the military (of few countries) that controls the area. Why is the South Pole so protected and secretive?
FLYING ‘ABOVE’ THE SOUTH POLE
Once a Scientists friend of mine started arguing with me about the shape of the earth, obviously defending its ‘globeness’. I told him to do a small experiment and get back to me. He hasnt got back about the experiment yet! All i asked him to do was to take a ‘Globe’ and place a miniature plane on NZ and fly the plane over the South Pole towards Argentina. I asked him to pause when the Plane is right ‘above’ the Pole and just check the position of the Plane. Scientists would immediately say that because of gravity we wont feel we are upside down. But the Wise would note that i had not mentioned about people inside the Plane….
…I just wanted you to note the position of the Plane!!!! Can a passenger aircraft fly upside down for so long, without any technical problems???
(I am seriously loving this childish concept of globe earth!!! It sure is a lot more fun than the Flat earth)!!!! 😀 😀
A READER’S ‘INTELLIGENT’ REMARK:
A reader by the name “Whatever never curves?” said: “Guessing you’ve never heard of the term ‘meniscus’ then! This article is a joke.”
(Pic source: http://www.sciencesource.com)
My Simple Response to him/her (or other) was: “Meniscus can happen only when water is covered on all sides with a ‘wall’ (curvature caused by surface tension). You are reiterating my point, my friend!!! Still Blind, huh??”
I hope by now you would have realised that Modern Science (in General and Globe Earth belief in particular) is just another Religion that has its roots in Greek Mythology; Camouflaged as anti-religious, only to entrap the blind and the gullible.
TAKING THE WIND OUT OF THE GLOBE… AND LEAVING IT AS FLAT AS EVER!!
I am going to agree here (for the sake of argument) that God actually dictated EVERY word in the original Scriptures. I am even willing to agree (if you don’t mind) that God physically held the hands of those who COPIED the original manuscripts so they could do it without missing even a single punctuation… (See, I am willing to agree what most of you wouldn’t)!
(Pic courtesy: duonglinh.cdnvn)
But … (now, this is one big BUT!), since most Hebrew words have more than one meaning attached to it, how could those who translated from the copy-scripts decide which one of those words would have been the author’s original choice??? For example: the Hebrew word “Ruach” (translated as “Spirit”) can mean wind, breath, exhalation, life, anger, spirit: – air, blast, courage, mind, side, spiritual, tempest, vain, whirlwind…! With such variety of words at my disposal I could interpret Gen 1:2 – And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters, as: And the ‘anger’ of God moved over the face of the waters!! Or Gen 6:3 – And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man as: And the Lord said, My ‘air’ shall not always strive with man…!!
Some words like “alah” in Hebrew, found in Gen 2:6 and is translated as “went up”, can even have opposite meanings: ascend, climb up or fall! HENCE NO ONE – EXCEPT GOD HIMSELF AND THE ORIGINAL WRITERS – CAN AUTHORITATIVELY ESTABLISH THE TRANSLATOR’S CHOICE OF A WORD AS RIGHT OR WRONG!!!!! “What about the ‘context’?”, you may ask. Well, isnt the context also made up of the choice of more such words, isnt it?!!
Another example (not just to rub it in, but also to get you into a nice ‘groove’ before giving you the jolt!): Gen 2:1– Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. 2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. With the variety of meanings each Hebrew word provides, I am going to translate this verse differently: Thus the “lofty” “nations” were “destroyed”, and all their “army”. And the seventh “time” God made “clean riddance” of his “cattle” which he “had become”; and he “celebrated” on the seventh “day” “over” all his work which he had “bruised”…!!!! 😀 Why Not?!
On the basis of what I have shown above and the backing of what I have learnt over the past few years, I am going to translate the Creation Story mentioned in Genesis in a way that it brings out what I feel is more likely what had happened. This has nothing to do with Judaist teachings. Infact, even the Jews will be “jolted” to see this! What you are going to read below is radical in the light of both Jewish and Christian teachings. Some of it is probably brought out for the first time within this group!! How then do I insist on this being a truer interpretation? Because, as you will realise when you read through, it straightens out almost all of the grey areas – those previously unanswerable questions! Let me remind you, I have only chosen words and meanings available in the lexicons. So, here we go….!
Lets start with Gen 1:1 – It is translated into English as: In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. But in Hebrew it is: rê’shı̂yth – bârâ’ – ‘ĕlôhı̂ym – ‘êth – shâmayim – ‘êth – ‘erets. And with the available Hebrew meanings for each word, this is how I translate it:
Gen 1:1-The gods first chose their heavenly places and their nations.
I’ve given below a break-up of the Hebrew words and its available meanings for this verse so that you know how I arrived at this translation:
rê’shı̂yth – first, in place, time, order or rank (specifically a firstfruit): – beginning, chief (-est), first (-fruits, part, time), principal thing.
bârâ’ – (absolutely) to create; (qualified) to cut down (a wood), select, feed (as formative processes): – choose, create (creator), cut down, dispatch, do, make (fat).
‘ĕlôhı̂ym – gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: – angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty.
‘êth – in the demonstrative sense of entity; properly self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely): – (As such unrepresented in English.)
shâmayim – from an unused root meaning to be lofty; the sky (as aloft; the dual perhaps alluding to the visible arch in which the clouds move, as well as to the higher ether where the celestial bodies revolve): – air, X astrologer, heaven (-s).
‘êth – in the demonstrative sense of entity; properly self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely) : – (As such unrepresented in English).
‘erets – From an unused root probably meaning to be firm; the earth (at large, or partitively a land): – X common, country, earth, field, ground, land, X nations, way, + wilderness, world.
The word “Elohiym”, according to the lexicon normally means “gods” – not “God”! Up until Gen 2:4, the word Elohiym is used without any accompanying title or article. As you can see above, Elohiym can also mean judge, angel, mighty men or gods. When used alone, it can NEVER refer to the Almighty God. For example: Exo 18:11 – Now I know that the LORD (yehôvâh) is greater than all other gods (‘ĕlôhı̂ym). Exo 12:12 – “and I will bring judgment on all the gods (‘ĕlôhı̂ym) of Egypt. I am the LORD (yehôvâh)”. Jos 22:22– The LORD (yehôvâh) God (‘êl) of gods (‘ĕlôhı̂ym).
If, as is commonly taught, the plurality of the word Elohiym refers to the Trinity of the Godhead, then Ex 18:11 should mean: Yehovah is greater than the Triune God! HENCE THE CLAIM THAT THE WORD “ELOHIYM”, BY ITS PLURALITY, REFERS TO THE “TRIUNE” GOD, IS SIMPLY ABSURD, TOTALLY NONSENSICAL AND AGAINST THE BASIC SENSE OF THE WORD! But, like in the verse below, when a specific title is used along with it, its meaning changes: Gen 2:4 – in the day that the LORD (yehôvâh) God (‘ĕlôhı̂ym) made the earth and the heavens… And this usage changes the creation story!
But, isn’t it unscriptural to consider that “gods”, and not “Yehovah” as being instrumental in the creation event in Gen 1? Firstly, you need to understand who the Scriptures refer to as “gods”. Just to help you in your thinking: HOW CAN GOD (YEHOVAH) BE A “GOD OF GODS” IF THERE REALLY ARE NO OTHER “GODS”??!! Its like claiming to be a “father” of many children without really having any children; Or a Director of a company which does not have any employees…!! God is not that cheap that He has to claim false titles for Himself. SO WHO ARE THESE “ELOHIYM” (GODS) WHOSE “EL” (GOD) IS “YEHOVAH” (ETERNAL ONE)? (I am writing about this in another write up, but for now read: “Deciphering G-O-D”, below).
Secondly, as you would have noted in my translation above, GEN 1:1 DOES NOT TALK ABOUT ANY CREATION ACTIVITY!!! It only talks about a selection process. Gods selected their lands! In this light, the Hindu belief that different planets are ruled by different gods does not seem farfetched. (Now, only if you keep reading you will understand it fully)!
Let me repeat:
Gen 1:1-The gods first chose their heavenly places and their nations.
2 -The land existed as desolate, devoid and dark for a long time because of a catastrophe. And the spirit gods shook over its face their semen.
(Oh, I know…! Just go to the lexicons and search out these words for yourselves. No spoon-feeding). Just as there are similarities between the Sanskrit and Hebrew languages, there are a lot of similarities between Jewish religious thoughts and Hinduism (things even Jewish teachers are not fully aware of!). According to some Hindu teachings, living beings were created when gods shook their semen onto the earth. The Hebrew word “mayim” used there for “water”, though commonly used to refer to drinking water, by euphemism can also mean – urine, semen: – + piss, wasting.
Since there is no reason to conclude that Gen 1 mentions about the first creation of the earth we now live in. But we could conclude that gods (elohyim), after first choosing their spaces, started their creation process in the places they selected for themselves. That way it is not hard to understand why intellectuals belonging to Hinduism can believe that Parashuram created Kerala by throwing his spade (Now, only if you keep reading you will understand it fully)!
3– And gods commanded light to come forth and light came forth.
This does not refer to any universal light, but is very clearly the light that came out of the darkness that covered the “land” (solar system?) at that time.
4 – The gods, they perceived that the light was truly precious: and so gods made a separation between the light and the darkness.
5 – The gods pronounced light as life and darkness as a misfortune. Came dusk and came dawn – the first time.
Please note: the Hebrew word “Yom”, translated as “day”, is mentioned only now (in vr 5), not before! In Hebrew, vr 5 ends as: hayah ereb hayah boqer yom echad. Since “Yom” also means a “process of time” or a period, the verse can be translated as: came dusk came dawn time first! The NIV is more accurate with its translation:“And there was evening, and there was morning–the first day”. Unlike the KJV, which translates it as: “And the evening and the morning were the first day”. The use of “were” is not there in the Hebrew text and is used there by KJV to give it a different meaning.
We should also note here that the words “ereb” and “boqer” specifically means “dusk” and “dawn” and not “day” and “night”. The verse below makes it clear: Gen 8:22 – While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day (yôm) and night (layil lêyl) shall not cease. So KJV has got its basics wrong here. I always used to wonder why “dusk” is mentioned as the start of a day in Genesis and not the “dawn”… now I know – its all just a big misinterpretation based on how Yom is translated!
In vr 5 the “dusk” follows the emergence of light and its separation from darkness, and then “dawn” follows dusk, after which a new time or day is born, in which a new work is done! In other words, AFTER an act of creation, there was dusk which was followed by dawn and then a new day and a new creation!!! So that gives us the freedom to conclude that the day starts at dawn, when the first rays of sun starts driving the night away – and that makes more sense! NOW, THE JEWS WILL BE SHATTERED TO KNOW THAT THE PHRASE USED THERE DOES NOT IN ANY WAY REFER TO THE START OF A NEW DAY AT DUSK!! The Jews and the Muslims count the start of the day at dusk, and Christians, most absurdly, count it from the middle of the night! But, interestingly, Hinduism counts the start of a day from the dawn!
From vr 1-4, we see the gods choosing their own spaces and then creating the light before starting off with their creational activities. From the way vr 5 ends (and with a good mix of some common sense) we can understand that THE FIRST DAY COMES ONLY AFTER THE CREATION OF THE LIGHT, BECAUSE HOW CAN THERE BE A “DAY” WITHOUT “LIGHT”?! Hence, the first day starts only in vr 5, AFTER the creation of light!
THIS CALLS FOR A RE-ARRANGEMENT OF THE CREATION TIMETABLE (!!!!):
– 1st Day (vr 5) – making of the firmament (vrs 6-8).
– 2nd Day (vr 8) – dry land and plants (vrs 9-12).
– 3rd Day (vr 13) – great and small lights in heaven for signs and seasons (vrs 14-18).
– 4th Day (vr 19) – fish and fowl emerge from water (vrs 20-22)*. Very Scientific!
– 5th Day (vr 23) – cattle and creatures emerge from the earth (24,25). Hinduism-like.
– 6th Day (vr ?) – man was designed (vrs 26-30).
– 7th Day (vr ?) – The day each creation was designated its role.
*This is how vrs 20-23 should have been translated: The gods commanded: let the waters bring out moving creatures that has life. And the waters brought forth fish and fowl in abundance. Those who know science would know how much more likelier it is for this to have happened this way than any other!
Except for after the creation of the firmament on the first day and the creation of ‘man’ on the 6th day (the first and the last creations mentioned in Ge 1), the word “good” is used to describe every creation. And each time, after the mention of “good”, we see the start of a new day and a new creation. Hence, it is surprising, that inspite of the use of the word “good” after the creation of cattle and creatures on the 5th day (vr 25), there is no mention of the start of another new day!
Gen 1:31 ends by saying: came dusk came dawn sixth day. Yet, we see Gen 2:2 starting with the mention of the activities of the 7th day. AND, UNLESS WE ACCEPT THAT THE FIRST “DAY” COULD EXIST EVEN BEFORE THE CREATION OF “LIGHT”, WE CANNOT FALL BACK TO THE OLD CREATION ORDER BASED ON WHICH WE ASSUME THAT GEN 1:31 TALKS ABOUT THE END OF 6TH DAY.
The solution: had the “hayah ereb hayah boqer” of vr 31 been mentioned at the end of vr 25 (keeping up with the order till then), and the one in vr 31 ended with “hayah ereb hayah boqer – yom shebiyiy (day seven)”, then the whole ‘schedule’ would have fallen right in place – with a lot more sense! Unless someone insists that God physically held the hands of every manuscript copiers and controlled their every thought while they were on it, I am willing to give some leeway for human error – deliberate or otherwise – to have crept in right from the first copy-writing to the final translation! As long as it is not a case of direct divine dictation at every stage – original writing, copy writing, and translation, there is bound to be mistakes. Haven’t you played “Chinese Whisper”?!
26 – And gods said, let us make a ruddy image that resembles us, to rule over the fish of the sea, the birds of the air, beasts of the whole earth and every reptile that moves on the earth.
Reference Word used Heb Mean
– Gen 1:26 – “man” – adam – ruddy.
– Lam 4:7 – “ruddy” – adam – reddish.
– Songs 5:10 – “ruddy” – adom – rosy.
– 1Sam 17:42 – “ruddy” – admoniy – reddish.
WE HAVE TO NOTE A VERY IMPORTANT POINT HERE: IT IS NOT CLAIMED ANYWHERE IN THE CREATION STORY OF GEN 1 THAT THE CREATION OF “MAN” MENTIONED IN VR 26 IS THE FIRST EVER CREATION OF A MAN – OR THE LAST!!
27 – So gods designed a ruddy image in their resemblance. The image gods designed in their resemblance, were divided into male and female selves.
According to some ancient beliefs, gods consist of both the sexes. Those who know biology knows that it is possible for both the sexes to be present in one body. Hence a person who is a bisexual is considered to have a god-like, dual spirited soul (not necessarily “body”). Here we see that when gods created human beings, they separated the sexes and gave them a different body.
28 – And gods blessed the images and said: O gods! Take up authority on thyself and completely subdue the nations. Rule over the fish of the sea, the birds of the air and every living being that moves on the earth.
The ruddy beings were given ‘complete’ authority to rule over “the nations” and “every living being that moves”, which would include the non-ruddy human beings – the black race (who probably survived the previous “catastrophe”, after which this new creation process started). No wonder excavations keep throwing up human bones that are ages old! And life in Africa is said to have been the oldest! This explains Cain’s fear of being attacked and the special protection he got from God! It also explains what Cain meant when he said to Yehovah that he will be hidden from His face.
This also explains why Yehovah was upset with the SONS of gods (Elohyim) mingling with the daughters of ‘men’ (Adam, whom He created).The “Sons of God” in Gen 6 and Job 1 are literally sons of gods – the human representation of Elohiym – the ruddy beings. Compare with Job 38:7. According to Gen 6:4, giants were already there and children born to sons of gods and daughters of men were also mighty men from eternity past (or, from the previous life)…!!
1– Thus the heaven and the earth were completed with all its people.
2 – And the seventh day the gods finished deputing all that they had made.
3 – And gods congratulated each other on the seventh day and dedicated it for celebration because of all the work they had planned and executed.
Here we see that the gods are done with their creations and they celebrate their achievement by giving themselves a “weekly off” and a ‘party’!
Ge 2:4 – This is the detail of the heavens and the earth as they were created when Yehovah Elohim created them.
This verse draws a line between the creation acts of the gods (Elohim) in Gen 1 and that of Yehovah God. It doesn’t mean that what the gods created was destroyed by Yehovah. The gods created the ‘ruddy’ men – the whites, but Yehovah moulded man from the clay of the ground – the brownish men. Compare it with Gen 6:6,7- Yehovah repented that He made men on the earth and He (Yehovah) vowed to destroy the men He had made (vr7) – not the whole world!
FROM GEN 2:4, YEHOVAH ELOHIYM COMES INTO THE PICTURE AND A DIFFERENT CREATION STORY BEGINS. Here is a comparison of both the creations (Gen 1 & Gen 2:4):
1) Gen 1 – Creation by Elohyim
Gen 2 – Creation by Yehovah Elohyim
2) Gen 1 – Elohyim designed male and female images
Gen 2 – Yehovah moulded a male out of the ground
3) Gen 1 – Human images designed after the creation of plants
Gen 2 – Man moulded before the creation of plants (vr5)*
4) Gen 1 – Animals created before man
Gen 2 – Animals created out of the ground after the creation of man.
5) Gen 1 – Elohyim designed men in their likeness and they were living beings (Ge 1:27)
Gen 2 – Yehovah moulds man out of the ground and gives him life by breathing into him (Ge 2:7).
*In Ge 2:5, we see an empty, dry earth – with no rain and no man to work on it – when Yehovah created Adam! (6 – There came up fog over the earth and moistened the whole soil). But in Ge 1, we see an earth already teeming with life when Elohyim made their images!
Verses where different names of “GOD” first appear:
Ge 1:1 – In the beginning Elohim created; 26 – Then Elohim said, “Let us make man…”
Ge 2:4 – When the Yehovah Elohim made the earth and the heavens
Ge 12:1 – The Lord Yehovah had said to Abram
Ge 15:1 – After this the word of Yehovah came to Abram in a vision….
Vr 2 – But Abram said, Adonay Yehovih
Vr 7 – He also said to him, I am the Yehovah who brought you out of Ur
Ge 17:1 – When Abram was ninety-nine years old, the Lord appeared to him and said, I am EL Shaddai
Almost none of the major world religions have given a first name for the Only Almighty God. “Om” in Hinduism just means “an all-encompassing one” who is both the creator and the destroyer. The word “Shaddai” in Hebrew also means “the nurturer and the destroyer”. Even the name “Yehovah”, is not a Noun! It is an amalgamation of the first letters of a sentence (read more below).
Many world religions have this concept of gods having appeared in different forms (avatars), but none of these gods are considered THE ultimate, all-powerful God. But many times such avatars are referred to as God almighty more because of whom they represent.
In that sense, the saying that God is one and everyone calls on Him with different names, makes some sense. Because everyone who believes in a God believes that there is ONE Almighty God who is above all other gods (including Hindus who worship the ONE Almighty God through His different avatars! Thus, Hinduism is NOT a polytheist religion!!!).
IF WE BELIEVE THAT THERE IS ONLY ONE ALMIGHTY GOD THEN HOW CAN WE BE WORRIED ABOUT SOMEONE ELSE BELIEVING IN ANOTHER ALMIGHTY GOD?! AND IF THAT OTHER PERSON ALSO BELIEVES THAT THERE IS ONLY ONE ALMIGHTY GOD THEN HOW CAN BOTH BE TALKING ABOUT DIFFERENT GODS??!!
We have to keep in mind that EL (God) is a title and Shaddai (Almighty) is the adjective given to the title – THEY ARE NOT NAMES! Likewise, YHWH (Yehovah), though used commonly as a noun (introduced so by Moses) is in reality, a Tetragrammaton. As I had revealed in one of my previous write-ups, “I am that I am” (of Ex 3:14) is NOT revealed there as God’s name! God was revealing His state of being. As a verb it means “to be” or “to exist”, and so the sentence can mean “I am my own cause” or “I self-exist”. Thus the word YHWH actually means “the eternally self-existent One”. So, we have an Almighty (Shaddai) God (EL), who is Eternally Existent (YHWH – YeHoVaH ).
Then there is Elohim (gods). EL means “God” and EL-ohim means “gods”. So there’s no way both EL and Elohim means the same – one is singular and the other plural. EL cannot be Elohim also because Yehovah is said to be the EL (God) of Elohim (gods): Joshua 22:22 – אלאלהיםיהוה – Yehovah, EL of Elohim (Self-existent, God of gods). As I said, just like how I cannot claim to be a king of a kingdom without having a kingdom in the first place, God cannot claim to be the God of gods if there are no gods, in the first place. So, who does this Elohim (gods) refer to?
Let me introduce to you the bad ones first. There are naughty, disobedient, and even wicked gods (Elohim). Righteous men who lead an exemplary life are elevated to be righteous or holy Elohim. As inheritors of god-like image, they are given the responsibility to spread godly knowledge to likely candidates (like with Enoch). Similarly, wicked men through their wicked influences are elevated to being revered as gods by men. And they go about causing trouble in God’s creations, leading them to rebellion and destruction. The first of whom is said to be Nimrod – grandson of Noah.
Deu 32:17 – They sacrificed unto devils, not to God (Eloha); to gods (Elohim) whom they knew not, to new gods (Elohim) that came newly up, whom your fathers feared not.
God here is talking about evil men (devils) who are elevated to be wicked Elohim, and are worshipped by men. The later part of the verse also means that the patriarchs of Israel feared other Elohim…!! Now, eat that! (The verses below will help you in digesting it…!!!):
Ge 5:24 – Enoch moved along with gods (Elohim) – and he was unsearchable because Elohyim took (lâqach) him away. Enoch had a constant relation with gods and he got his wisdom from them. He was so liked by Elohyim that they carried him away without letting him pass through the process of physical death. For us, lesser mortals, we too can hope for a carrying away – after death, as sons of Korah wrote: Psa 49:15 – But God will redeem my soul from the power of the grave: for he shall receive (lâqach) me.
I believe that Enoch was elevated to being an Elohim. So can human beings become gods? Psa 82:6– I have said, Ye are gods (‘ĕlôhı̂ym); and all of you are children of the most High. 7 But ye shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes. Also Isa 41:23…!!!
(Pic source: http://pastorpaulallen.blogspot.in)
You will also be pleased to know this: Gen 32:28 – And he said, Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel: for as a prince hast thou power with God (Elohim) and with men, and hast prevailed. 30 – And Jacob called the name of the place Peniel: for I have seen God (Elohim) face to face, and my life is preserved. Here, Jacob is not fighting with the Almighty Yehovah but with an Elohyim! But, if you insist that Elohyim by its plurality refers to the Triune God and that Jacob was not fighting any ‘god’, then it should mean that Jacob was fighting God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit, all at the same time and all three together could not defeat a cowardly, hairless man, inspite of fighting with him the whole night!!!!! (You wont get me to believe that nonsense. I can assure you that!!).